Washington Town Creates Currency for Local Use

Andy’s Notes: The four requirements of any money are intrinsic value, a unit of account, a store of wealth, and a medium of exchange. These new minted ‘bills’ are able to be used locally, but the holders cannot compel any business or individual to accept them as legal tender. The US has legal tender laws that specify what may be used as legal tender. Does this make it a bad idea? Not necessarily. The USDollar doesn’t meet the ‘store of wealth’ requirement because of inflation and it is still accepted everywhere in the US. The Dollar also has little or no intrinsic value. The Tenino bills lack intrinsic value as well, but meet the other three requirements as long as everyone in the cohort is willing to accept them as legal tender and – this is a biggie – the bills are backed in such manner that whoever runs the printing press can’t print themselves a nice pile and go out and buy real goods with them.

The last sentence above is key to why banking systems fail over time. The temptation for the printers of money to run off currency beyond the backing is too much. This is why the banks of the 1800s failed so often. They’d over-issue silver certificates beyond the silver stored. The people would get wise to it and run the bank demanding silver and the banks would run out and have to close.

Since we no longer have redeemability on US currency, it makes over-issuance a real problem, especially in the digital age. Will the ‘wooden dollar’ experiment work? Time will tell. If nothing else, this is yet another signpost on the trek to the end of the road for the used and abused USPetrodollar.

Sutton/Mehl

TENINO, United States, July 9 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) – Tucked away under lock and key in a former railroad depot turned small-town museum in the U.S. state of Washington, a wooden printing press cranked back to life to mint currency after nearly 90 dormant years.

The end product: $25 wooden bills bearing the town’s name – Tenino – with the words “COVID Relief” superimposed on the image of a bat and the Latin phrase “Habemus autem sub potestate” (We have it under control) printed in cursive.

With the coronavirus pandemic plunging the United States into a recession, decimating small businesses and causing job losses across the country, some local governments are looking for innovative ways to help residents weather the storm.

For Tenino, the answer was the revival of the local currency that had bolstered the town’s economy in 1931 in the wake of the Great Depression.

“It was kind of an epiphany: Why don’t we do that again?” Mayor Wayne Fournier told the Thomson Reuters Foundation. “It only made sense.”

Tenino, a town of less than 2,000 people located about 60 miles (95km) southwest of Seattle, started printing the local banknotes in April, five weeks into Washington state’s lockdown.

Anyone with a documented loss of income as a result of the pandemic is eligible for up to $300 a month of the local currency.

Businesses up and down the town’s quaint Main Street accept the wooden note for everything except alcohol, tobacco, cannabis and lottery tickets.

Tenino’s city government backs the local currency, which merchants can exchange for U.S. dollars at city hall at a 1:1 rate.

Susan Witt, executive director of the Schumacher Center for a New Economics, a Massachusetts-based think tank, said alternative currencies like Tenino’s banknote are better than direct cash payments at boosting local economies.

“The City of Barcelona gave donations (in 2017/18) to sports teams and cultural groups as well as social programs (then) watched these donations go to big box stores,” she said in emailed comments.

“So, it created a local currency so that these ‘discretionary’ funds in its budget would circle back to support locally-owned businesses.”

‘WOVEN INTO OUR DNA’

Mayor Fournier noted that, for long-time Tenino residents, the wooden notes are nothing new.

The tiny town founded around a sandstone quarry achieved national prominence in 1931 when civic leaders printed a wooden local currency to restore consumer confidence after the town’s bank failed during the Great Depression.

“This is woven into the DNA of the community,” Fournier said. “My great aunt Erlene has the family collection all stashed away.”

The mayor brought the idea of resurrecting the town’s legacy project to the city council as a way to provide economic relief to businesses and residents suffering as a result of lockdown measures to slow the spread of COVID-19.

In April councillors approved the proposal to issue up to $10,000 in local scrip.

So far, 13 residents have successfully applied for the funds and some $2,500 worth of wooden bills have been issued, Fournier said, with donations upping the total funds available to $16,000.

Risk Management – Default Risk

Investors don’t normally think of themselves as lenders – banks do the lending right? Not always. If you have any kind of bonds or mutual funds, closed-end funds or ETFs that own bonds, you are a lender. Not in the direct sense. You don’t have a contract with the borrower to be repaid, for example – unless you own a government or corporate bond directly.

During the 2008 financial crisis, the word default was a household term. People were defaulting on mortgages, companies were defaulting on their bonds, some companies, like Lehman Brothers, couldn’t get a loan because they were viewed as a high default risk.

There are a couple of points to remember. The first is that return needs to be commensurate with the risk involved. Oftentimes the market might indicate which instruments are perceived as more ‘risky’ – they’ll have higher yields than other comparably rated instruments. Debt is nearly always rated. There are various ratings agencies. Standard & Poors, Moody’s, and Fitch are three of the major agencies. They all have a different nomenclature for their grading, but it’s the same as your report card.

A is the best, B second-best, and so forth. You should see yields increase as you look at lower-rated bonds. There is a fairly significant misconception right now. People seem to think that because the government and/or fed are bailing everything out that there is no longer any default risk. Again, this is not simply an American circumstance, this is more global. So simply shifting bond purchases to overseas companies won’t necessarily help.

The big advantage of holding a bond over a stock is that 1) you’re going to get some type of interest even if it is small. Companies may or may not pay a dividend on their common stock. Generally the preferred shares, which are hybrids and have characteristics of both stocks and bonds also have interest. The second big advantage to owning debt is that you’re a creditor of the company. If there IS a bankruptcy, the bondholders and other creditors are first in line for any distribution of the company’s assets. Stocks are considered equity.

Keep in mind that a default and a bankruptcy are two different events. A default is when the borrow stops paying on a particular loan or multiple loans. While a default is an alarming development, it doesn’t necessarily equal a bankruptcy in which the company either is permitted to re-organize or goes out of business altogether. So if you own bonds from a particular company and that company goes bust, you might get some of your capital back, but almost certainly not all of it. If you’re a shareholder in a company and the company goes broke, it is extremely unlikely to have any return of capital.

When considering the risk of default it is always good to look at a company’s balance sheet and several years worth of income statements at a bare minimum. A SWOT analysis is also helpful. What sorts of events might result in your company not having money to make good on its debts? What is going on right now is certainly going to cause problems. What other types of events could hurt your company? We would encourage people to stay away from the assumption that industries and companies will always be bailed out by governments. After all, investors and creditors in Lehman Brothers, didn’t think the USGovt would leave the company twisting in the wind.

There are some very important lessons to be learned by studying economic and financial history with the goal being to learn from the mistakes of others rather than having to endure the pain of defaults in your own portfolio.

Sutton/Mehl

Chart of the Day – US National Debt by the Year

Notes: Almost exactly 6 years to go from $5T to $6T. We’ll ignore the jump from $23T to $24T because of the emergency spending. We assert that the spending would have happened anyway, but omit it in the interests of full disclosure. The jump from $22T to $23T took only 8.5 months. The slope of the debt curve is increasing at nearly the square of the annual increase.

Economists love to talk about ‘escape velocity’ in terms of economic recovery. We’re going to inject that term into the debt discussion. By 2024, the Congressional budget office estimates the national debt will be at $36T – another $12 trillion over top of where we are now. So.. $12T in the next four years. In the previous four years, the growth was around $4.5T.

It doesn’t take a mathematician to figure out if we get to $36T by 2024, there is no going back. In all honesty, that ship has likely already sailed. Our planning needs to move into the next phase now. Where do we go from here? We’ll be addressing that, along with some pointers on general risk management in the weeks that follow.

Just one follow-up question – when was the last time you heard anyone talk about the infamous debt ceiling???? Something to think about during all this time we all have for contemplation.

Sutton/Mehl

**Chart compliments of CNS News**

US National Debt