Yesterday’s article on BRICS / CBDC has already caused quite a stir among readers of the blog. We’ve received a couple of questions so far that we feel need to be publicly answered.
Where have you guys been?
When we started our occasional, then more frequent collaboration, some early agreements were made. First among these was that we would not publish just for the sake of publishing. We wanted to have something to say. Secondarily, we wanted to find the angles that weren’t getting the attention they required.
The scene, if you will, has also changed quite a bit since this endeavor began. Back in ‘the day’, we knew most of the analysts who published regularly. We’d often swap info and compare information. Today that has changed. We’ve lost count of the number of authors, YouTube creators, etc. that follow these matters.
Since we never relied on the publishing of articles for income, which is the model of most ‘truth-tellers’ today, we didn’t feel the need to speak unless we had something worthy of adding to the discussion. We believe (our opinion) that the marriage of truth telling to one’s livelihood is a dangerous combination, so we didn’t do it. All that said we are glad to receive these questions.
Are you going to publish more regularly?
We DO expect becoming more regular again, simply because things in the corner of the world we study have started to move with purpose again. There was a period of stagnation in that regard for a while. The world consumed, ran up endless debt, ad nauseum. This was nothing new. We stopped analyzing the risk markets simply because fundamentals have ceased to matter. The multiples are insane, and there are already literally thousands of others doing that work. Should we enter another period of crisis similar to 2008, 2000, etc. we will probably provide some analysis, especially if the monetary actions are driving the crisis, which they almost certainly will be at this point.
Can we read your work elsewhere?
Andy sent the link and Word Document of the BRICS post to all the sites who had customarily published our work in the past. However, we did the same with the Modern Monetary Theory report back in 2020 and there were only a few takers. Your best bet is to subscribe to the blog. The only time you’ll receive an email is when we post something. Please see our Privacy Policy at the top of the home page regarding your personal information or click the link above.
What have you been doing all this time?
This might be the best question of all. We haven’t been dormant. In fact, we’ve been quite busy. In addition to our Cobb-Douglas based GDP model, we’ve been working on several others of a monetary nature. We are close to being able to release some initial results on one of those models – and investors in the share markets will find it very interesting. The idea for this model actual came from a reader of ours in Australia. It’s the newest, but we felt it might be the most timely so we shifted our time there.
Please keep in mind, we both have full-time jobs, families, and all the tasks related to those things. This is a labor of love for us. We have never and will never charge for this work. You’ll never see an ad on this blog. You’ll never hear us ‘plug’ any products or services. We’re doing the best we can to keep this blog pure. If you want to support the work, please share it with family, friends, colleagues, etc. That’s the greatest honor and if we’re worthy of that, then we’ve done our job.
Neel Kashkari is hardly a household name. We’d speculate that most people wouldn’t recognize it. Neel was the Goldman Sachs alum who was hand-picked by Hank “A Strong Dollar is in the National Interest” Paulson back in 2008 to handle the disbursement of the TARP bailout money. That’s the $750 billion bailout that was initially shot down by the House, but eventually passed a few days later after Paulson did some rather heavy handed and unapologetic arm-twisting.
We’re going to link up a couple of videos throughout as sort of a walk down memory lane. 2008 was, after all, a dozen years ago already.
Ok, so what? What does this have to do with Neel? Well, after the bailout was passed, an odd thing happened. Instead of being used to buy troubled assets, the money went right to the banks. Kashkari was grilled by then Rep. Dennis Kucinich about his activities. Kashkari had already mastered the thousand-yard stare while being grilled which immediately caught our attention. He’d been trained for this.
After the brewing scandal was snuffed out by further epic plunges in global financial indices, Kashkari was quietly taken off the scene and ran like a refugee to a cabin in the woods of Northern California. He would remain there until 2016 when he was called off the bench to head up the Minneapolis Fed. That really got our attention. From a cabin in the woods to an extremely high level position in one of the most corrupt enterprises man has ever known after spending more than a half dozen years in exile? We should be so lucky.
Unfortunately, that’s not where the saga ends. Lately Neel Kashkari has been going around the talk show circuit saying that the only way to save the USEconomy is by doing essentially a full lock down on the US. Again, we’ll post some link to videos. We think Kashkari’s words carry a bit more weight just because of his pedigree and prior experience in sticking it to the taxpayers of this crumbling nation. How does a lock down save the economy?
We have a theory and we’re going to lay it out. The graphic below shows the rather alarming – and rapid – departure from the USDollar from two of the biggest up and coming economic powers out there: Russia and China. There are other countries engaged in similar activity and Andy has spoken on Liberty Talk Radio about these events for several years.
The USDollar’s reserve currency status is gone.It was in serious jeopardy going into this year, but after the blowout federal deficit even the dimmest bulb can see there is no way and certainly no will to ever pay off the national debt. Hyperinflation might be a tactic and we’ll talk about that eventually as well, but countries are bailing. It should be noted that the US is sanctioning EVERY SINGLE ONE of these countries at this moment and urging allies to do the same.
Other tripe and banal reasons are given, but this is clearly a move to protect the Dollar as long as possible. The house of cards is shaking and is about to get blown away like the houses of the first two of the three little pigs.
So why the call for a lock down? We’ll use basic economics to lay out our theory. When global demand for dollars decreases, those dollars need to go somewhere. If countries are using other currencies for international trade, their FOREX reserves will be changed to reflect this. Simply put, they won’t need to keep as many dollars. And why buy USGovt debt? It pays next to nothing – well below even the most cooked levels of price inflation. And there’s the very real possibility of switching to negative yields – especially in the series of shorter maturities.
These unneeded, unwanted dollars are starting to come home. Add to that all the funny money that has been created by the not-so-USFed to ‘buy everything’ in sight to keep financial markets stable. There are no reserve requirements, so the banking level can create massive inflation from making new loans. This is why the NASDAQ and S&P500 are at record highs. The repatriated dollars are being poured into financial markets and blowing up all manner of bubbles.
What is also happening is that consumer price levels are starting to rise at frightening levels. The change from May to June was .5654%, and the change from June to July was .5867%. These are annualized rates of around 7%. The central bank’s ‘comfort zone’ ends around 2.5% annualized.
Kashkari’s argument for a lock down now makes perfect sense. If America goes back to lock down, we’ll see consumer prices drop from lack of demand as was seen in March, April, and May. A lock down would hide the effects of all this funny money flowing back into the US.
Let’s fold into the mix our paper on Modern Monetary Theory from last summer. The first premise is that a central bank/government that acts as its own bank cannot go broke. It can print until the lights go out in Tennessee. BUT.. when consumer prices start to go up, the next step is raise taxes to pull money from the system. There have been quite a few articles talking about higher taxes. With real unemployment and underemployment where they are, does anyone think a tax increase would fly?
A lock down might not fly either, but any decrease in aggregate demand that Kashkari is able to squeeze from his bully pulpit is going to ‘help’ the situation. Note – it’s not going to help the average person. This is a move to protect a broken currency regime, the institution that brought it to fruition, and the total corruption of fiat currencies in general.
Keep in mind that the partial lockdowns from March through June caused a 33% contraction in GDP according to the USGovt. Our model showed a 43% contraction. Given that we use a totally different methodology, the difference isn’t surprising. Since the USGovt’s GDP model uses the purchase of finished goods rather than intermediate goods, we can say that aggregate demand fell by about a third in the second quarter. You can see in the chart above the impact that had on consumer prices. Kashkari and his ilk are looking for more of the same.
Another such drop in prices would enable them to repatriate even more dollars without it become too noticeable in the real economy. We might get Dow 30K, NASDAQ 14K and S&P500 4K, but that is the ‘good’ kind of price inflation. If consumer goods went up in proportionate amounts, there would be even more rioting than there is at present.
Why not just destroy the unused currency? Most of it is digital anyway. That’s the most common question we are expecting. It is very important to understand that true deflation doesn’t occur unless money is actually destroyed. Falling prices do not mean deflation. You can create a little deflation on your own if you pull all the ‘money’ from your bank account in cash, then set it on fire. Why would I do that, I can still use it!!! And that’s the answer. The repatriated dollars aren’t going to be destroyed because they can still be used. Not by Mr. and Mrs. Joe Average, but by the banking system.
The next step in this decoupling process is for major trading partners to start requiring the US to settle transactions in some other currency or possibly even gold. Make no mistake, that is why this campaign of sanctions and threats of military action are in place against countries like Venezuela and Syria. When in doubt, follow the money. Forget the terrorism for a minute and follow the money. Nicholas Maduro and Bashar al-Assad are a clear and present danger to dollar hegemony because they’re stepping out of the dollar for international trade. Andy analyzed the situation in Syria almost 7 years ago and accurately predicted that Russia would not leave Syria hang out to dry. And even more importantly, WHY they wouldn’t leave Syria – and why they have yet to do so.
On a day the S&P500 recouped ALL of its losses due to a global pandemic that the experts are telling us is going to only get worse, we can look at the above mechanism and understand exactly how all those gains took place. It is perhaps ironic that over the past few month the USDollar has struggled mightily – even against other fiat currencies backed by nothing but the never-ending stream of hot air from bankers the likes of Neel Kashkari.
Graham Mehl is a pseudonym. He is astonishingly bright, having received an MBA with highest honors from the Wharton Business School at the University of Pennsylvania. He has also worked as a policy analyst for several hedge funds and has consulted for several central banks. Among his research interests are finding more reliable measurements of economic activity than those currently available to the investing public using econometric modeling and collaborating on the development of economic educational tools.
Andy Sutton is a research and freelance Economist. He received international honors for his work in economics at the graduate level and currently teaches high school business. Among his current research work is identifying the line in the sand where economies crumble due to extraneous debt through the use of econometric modeling with constant reflection of economic history. His focus is also educating young people about the science of Economics using an evidence-based approach
For the past 8 years, wise investors have chosen to ignore the confusion and in many cases unplugged themselves from the traditional financial system, opting to become their own central bank and invest in gold and silver. Others have used a hybrid model of investing partially in the physical metals and partially in shares of precious metal miners and related companies. This has undoubtedly been the right move. The recent correction included, gold prices alone are up an amazing 45% just since my Survival Guide was published on 10/23/2006. For those who have been in since the beginning of the move, the gains have been even larger.
Many in the mainstream press will quickly scoff at the idea of holding Gold and Silver because they don’t pay dividends. So to be fair to their argument, I calculated the movement in the S&P500 Dividend Reinvested Index from 10/31/2006 to the last report at the end of this past July. Even with dividend reinvestment, the S&P500 is down 4.78% while Gold is up nearly 50%. This takes the primary argument against owning real money and blows its doors off. Granted, we’re only looking at a period of not quite 2 years here, but given the macroeconomic events that have transpired it is clear that real money was the way to go.
The question we need to ask now is pretty simple. Is anything going to change moving forward that will reverse this trend? Or, put another way, what would need to happen to make precious metals unsuitable for investment? There are dozens of prerequisites, but we’ll stick to the Big Four.
Since precious metals, particularly Gold are proxies for inflation, we would need to see worldwide inflation slow dramatically. A quick look at the chart below tells us this is nowhere near happening. The global supply of money in US$ terms has increased by 12.4% since mid-2007 from $53.7 Trillion to $60.3 Trillion. We’re still inflating like crazy. (Chart Compliments of dollardaze.org)
Geopolitical risk would have to decrease. Risk tends to be friendly towards precious metals. This because deep down, most people understand that fiat money is not real money, but only has value because its backing government says it does. Its value is based almost entirely on perception. Wars and rumors of wars tend to undermine political and therefore financial stability. On the other hand, gold has been recognized as real money for thousands of years because it is desirable, portable, homogeneous, and scarce. Scarcity and fiat money are 180 degrees diametrically opposite to each other.
Systemic risk to the financial system would need to be swept away. This is no simple task and, despite what Bernanke & Company choose to say, it is clear that the systemic risk to the financial system is nowhere near close to abating. Bank failures are on the rise and credit spreads are at record levels. The housing debacle has left many financial hand grenades in the portfolios of investment and commercial banks the world over and many have yet to go off.
Inflationary expectations would need to decrease significantly. Again, perception tends to be reality and if people are convinced that prices are going to continue to rise, then they will behave accordingly. They will seek out assets that protect their purchasing power. Commodities generally assume this role due to scarcity: they cannot be printed or digitally created like fiat money. And the more funny money that sloshes around chasing a finite quantity of goods, the more those goods will increase in terms of the fiat currency. To reverse this trend, people worldwide would have to get the idea that their money is going to buy more, not less. It is going to be difficult to accomplish that feat with the price of almost everything (except housing and stocks) going up.
Given just this cursory analysis, it is easy to see why Gold is a slam-dunk choice in terms of protecting wealth. Certainly, gold is prone to nasty corrections. Too often, people buy gold with the idea that they’re going to get ‘rich’. These folks fail to properly understand why it is they should own gold in the first place and are easily shaken out when a correction occurs. Gold should not be purchased with the expectation that it will make you rich. It should be acquired to protect your purchasing power. The recent rout in precious metals presents a fantastic opportunity for new buyers to get on board and for people who already have positions to add to them as circumstances permit.
One caveat that needs to be mentioned is the fact that the precious metal markets are prone to intervention and manipulation. These activities are disruptive to normal market function and can create disparities between the price of futures contracts and the actual metals themselves. GATA covers these activities in great detail and has done a masterful job assimilating a vast array of resources, articles, and other materials related to this topic. I highly recommend getting up to speed on this important issue before investing – particularly if you’re new to these markets.In totality, the recent correction in precious metals should be viewed not as a tragedy, but rather as the opportunity of a lifetime.
The world started 2020 on the most shaky of terms, economically speaking. The world was already in the early stages of a contraction in aggregate demand. The covers of magazines had articles of various corporate analysts and CEOs talking about a serious recession as early as late 2018. We stress this was a global contraction, not limited to one or even a few countries. As was the case in 2008 some would fare better than others for myriad reasons. The last few months of 2019 and the beginning of 2020 saw the resignation of CEOs from several prominent companies such as Disney.
Being perpetual cynics, we wondered if they knew something the rest didn’t. The prospect of a recession was largely downplayed in the US/UK/EU mainstream press, which was no surprise. They’ve been derelict in their duty for decades now. The average American/Brit/European had no idea what was coming. Even the central banking community was bathed in complacency. They’d achieved Ben Bernanke’s ‘Goldilocks Economy‘ even if only in their own minds.
We pointed to one event as a harbinger of an upcoming crisis as early as 2016 – the appointment of Neel Kashkari to the position of President of the Minneapolis ‘Fed’. Huh? Neel Kashkari was tapped by Henry ‘Hank’ Paulson back in 2008 to head up the TARP fund created by Congress in November of that year as part of the massive Wall Street bailout brought on by a spate of bankruptcies, insolvencies, and general financial mayhem.
Why Kashkari in 2016? The last we’d heard, he was living in the mountains of California planting potatoes or some such. The TARP mess stank on every level and it was apparent that once his work was done, Kashkari was off for a long, long early retirement. So his appointment to such a position registered an 8 out of 10 on the weird-stuff-o-meter.
Moving into 2020 the United States economy was balancing on the triple supports of consumerism, financial sector activity, and government excess. The FY 2019-20 Federal deficit was going to be one for the ages long before the term ‘Corona’ was known as anything other than part of the Sun.
Geopolitical tensions were high with the sanctioned assassination of a prominent Iranian general within the first few days of 2020 and the failed ongoing ouster of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro at the forefront. Add to that an ongoing trade war / war of words / saber-rattling between Washington and Beijing as well as a good deal of ill-rhetoric between Washington and Moscow. That’s just a small sampling.
With nearly all of the first world nations running persistent current account deficits and the rest of the economic superstructure living heavily on debt and financial speculation, it was only a matter of time. Would it be a pin that popped the ‘everything bubble’ or would it simply just slowly deflate (not to be confused with monetary deflation)?
So pervasive was and is the presence of debt in the circumstance of nations, states, trading blocs, provinces, municipalities, companies, and individuals that the trillions of dollars racked up by the US alone was not even viewed askance by economists OUTSIDE what would be considered the mainstream of the scientific economics community. Keynesianism was like a high-quality dime store pinata. Now matter how hard it was hit, it just kept spitting out candy.
We mentioned in My Two Cents on several occasions that this whole ‘system’, if you will, would go until it didn’t. It was a confidence game, just like the multitude of fiat currency regimes that backed it in the various corners of global commerce. As long as economic actors had ample supply of tokens (currencies), and another economic actor would accept those tokens in exchange for scarce land, labor, capital, and technology, the system worked.
Then the world got sick.
There has been much talk of ‘black swan’ events. The term was coined by a current events/geopolitics author Nassim Taleb. The black swan is something that nobody is looking or planning for. It is not on the radar. Period. There have been some who have been talking about pandemics in general for quite some time now in similar fashion to your authors considering the likelihood of economic fallout from the fact that the organized world has violated every law of economics imaginable. There’s always a reckoning day.
We are not going to discuss the SARS-nCOV-02 situation from a biologic/scientific standpoint as that is outside the scope of our expertise. We’re going to focus on nCV as a triggering event or black swan and the likely economic ramifications.
The amount of money that has already been borrowed/printed and spent is mind-blowing. It cannot be complicated by the human mind. The US National Debt blew right past $25 trillion. It is hard to fathom this but the growth of the national debt is a mathematical function based on the concept of fractional reserve banking. The debt was headed to where it is now anyway. That is going to be the biggest take-home. Would have it happened this fast without nCV? Probably not, but it was headed past $25T in the next 12 months regardless.
What nCV does is give governments the world over a free pass if you will on the print and spend / borrow and spend fiscal irresponsibility that has been going on for decades now. Europe reached its breaking point because of this foolishness in the past decade. The 2020s will be looked upon in history as the decade when the USDollar finally died.
That’s a bold pronouncement isn’t it? Not really. Who in their right mind is going to continue to lend to any entity that is so fiscally reckless? Ourselves along with many others have laid bare the runaway fiscal policy that has infected the US for so long. Now there is the element of public health involved and the general consensus is that we have to continue these spending policies, bailout entire industries, and even provide income to the populace. Anyone speaking out against any of this is labeled as being against helping people.
What needs to be understood is that this ‘help’ is only temporary. Think of the minimum wage. It is a very applicable analogy. Every increase of the minimum wage only lasts so long then another increase is required to produce the same result. Now, scale that up to the world’s economies and that’s what you’ve got. The ‘system’ needs ever-increasing amounts of stimulus to produce the same effect.
While grossly overused, the analogy of a drug addict is a very good one. Eventually the addict needs a fix just to feel normal. And so goes the global economy. If the stimulus is scaled back, the economy goes into withdrawal. The US economy is around 70% consumption and has been that way for nearly two decades now. This is not just a national or government problem. It transcends all layers of the economy. Even successful companies loaded up on cheap, low interest rate debt to conduct share buybacks, thus pushing stock prices higher.
Where do we go from here?
Even before the new year began, countries and companies outside the US were cutting deals outside the dollar. The dollar’s status as world’s reserve currency was being challenged. Expect that to continue – and accelerate. There won’t be a pronouncement that the dollar is no longer the world’s reserve currency. It likely will not be a headline. It’s been happening incrementally for years now. This latest fiscal quagmire will accelerate the matter. China is testing a digital currency. Russia has thousands of tons of gold. These countries don’t get along with America and Europe on a good day. The Russians already dumped nearly all of their US Government debt, but the Chinese still have a significant amount around $1 trillion.
A global reshuffling of the economic order was already taking place before 2020 started. Europe endured a partial crisis over excess debt and the austerity that followed. And all of that was just a small piece of the problem. Economic history is replete with examples of complacent countries and empires who thought it could never happen to them. Complacency might just be the most dangerous state of mind that man can occupy. We are quite sure the Romans would agree.
“The past month has been one of nearly continuous turmoil in the financial markets”. That might well be the understatement of this still fairly new century. Keep in mind that during the past 20 years, we’ve had 2 significant recessions (according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis), a complete meltdown of the .com mania, the inflation of a real-estate bubble and its subsequent bursting, the halving of US financial indexes, and the bankruptcy of names like Lehman Brothers, and AIG to name a few. Throw in a massive bailout, a fusillade of rescue programs like TARP, TSLF and the resulting blowout of the federal reserve’s balance sheet. This is within the first 10 years. Keep that in mind.
The second ten years have featured D-E-B-T – on all levels. Governments
of the world, states and provinces, local municipalities and parishes,
students, consumers, homeowners. In short? Pretty much everyone. That debt has
driven the economy for the past decade. Globally. Many will think this is just
an American problem. It’s not. Misery loves company, right? Not so fast. In
this brave new world of interlocking economies and financial systems, a failure
on the other side of the world can cause problems in our own back yards.
Entire countries have gone bust and have had to go hat in hand to their representative central bank. Remember Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, and Spain? Don’t forget the tiny island of Cyprus and its king-sized banking crisis, which led to a bank holiday and eventually a bail-in. Wait, we just talked about a bailout. What’s a bail-in? We penned a serious of articles on this topic back in 2013. Read them here. Keep in mind that this is very non-exhaustive and brief summation of some of the more important events.
Which brings us to the present. Yesterday, 3/11/2020, the ENTIRE yield curve for USGovt bills, notes, and bonds was under 1%. That’s not a typo. There is rampant talk of negative interest rates here in the US. This phenomenon is already happening in Germany – the powerhouse of the European Union and several other easily recognizable nations. Moves in the bond market that generally take many months are now taking days. If you’re planning on retiring and living on the interest of your bonds, you might want to rethink that strategy. Many of the people we communicate with regularly have themselves or know quite a few people who have gotten a 20% haircut or more on their equity investments since the beginning of the year.
Much of the more recent activity has been blamed on the emergence
of a new Coronavirus. The fear alone that has been imparted by the mainstream –
and even alternative media is bound to have some kind of impact on the global
economy. Economists are already clamoring for cash payments to citizens as a
means of ‘stimulating’ the economy. In the US we’ve done this twice previously
in the past two decades. Both were credited with averting nasty recessions.
Both went directly on the federal budget deficit here in the US. Debt has
indeed become the answer to all that ails most economies the world over.
The gyrations and volatility in financial markets have been
enough to give even seasoned investors a serious case of whiplash. In the past
10 trading days the Dow Jones Industrials Average here in the US has had its
two biggest down days – EVER – in terms of the number of points lost. Sandwiched
in there are some of the biggest up days – EVER – again, in terms of index
points. Oil crashed over 20% in a single day. Gold has broken out and is once
again around/over the very important $1650 level. Silver is probably the
bargain of the century to this point. Throw into all this a major year in terms
of the political arena. And no, we are not breaking our tradition of focusing
on policy. The policy provides the answers. The names only serve to
muddle the issues.
As we write this evening of the 10th of March in the year 2020, it is quite possible and likely that the economic and financial foundation that we all rest on has begun yet another metamorphosis into something completely different than we’re all used to. Contemplate the concept of negative interest rates alone. Such a ridiculous move would take several hundred years of investing philosophy and modeling and flush them directly down the toilet. Again, this is likely an understatement. The US went from a national debt around $14T during the 2012 campaign season to a level of $23.5 trillion in the early part of 2020. In 1986, America reached the $1 trillion mark. Any stimulus will go right on the tab.
Many people are electing to stay home for fear of
contracting COVID-19 and with all the uncertainty that exists regarding this
virus, we refuse to pass judgement. Since consumers are responsible for nearly
70% of US Gross Domestic Product, even a month’s cessation of vacations,
cruises, flying, going shopping and all the other activities that fall under
consumption, we could easily see a sizable dent popped into Q1 GDP. Or the
money might be spent online, and it might not affect GDP that much at all. The
situation in China can only be guessed. Sadly, national governments have a
growing aversion to the truth even when lives are at stake.
In summation, we cannot and will not make any ‘predictions’
regarding Q1 GDP, consumer spending and the balance of trade. Given that oil
has dropped precipitously, that drop will translate into lower gas prices at
some point and that will lower that portion of consumer spending, which will
negatively affect GDP. This reality makes a strong case that we should be
measure growth in units rather than dollars wherever and whenever it is
practical to do so. The best advice we can give is gather as much information
as possible and try to avoid making decisions based on emotion. Seeing the Dow
Jones Industrials Average lose over 2,000 points in a single trading will
unnerve even the savviest of investors.
Living off the interest from investments, for all purposes,
is not going to be feasible for the foreseeable future. Our economies are
hooked on low interest rates. That is helpful for the borrower, but lethal for
the investor. It forces investors with shorter time horizons into the riskier equity
markets. This situation represents a clear and present danger to the standard
of living for millions of people in America alone.
This is not all gloom and doom, however. Again, like 2008,
we have a chance to endure the economic pain necessary to down regulate our
debt-laden, consumption-oriented economy into something that doesn’t need
trillions of borrowed dollars each year just to keep plodding along at a snail’s
pace. We have an opportunity. Will we avail ourselves of it? If the talking
points coming out of the television and Internet media outlets is any
indicator, we will most likely not take this opportunity, opting instead to
kick the proverbial can down the road ensuring that the pain will only be worse
for the next generation when they are forced to deal with it. We challenge not
only America, but the rest of the world to put down the credit cards and take a
step back. We did it here in the US during 2010. We can do it again. But will
we?
We appreciate the large number of inquiries, questions, and comments regarding our recent paper on ‘MMT’. We’d also like to thank www.marketoracle.co.uk for giving it such a favorable position on their website, we truly appreciate it. We do this not for accolades, however, but to raise awareness.
Along that thread, we’ve decided the best way to handle the communications we’ve received is with a brief audio transmission, which we will post on this site – within the next week – to give us more time to read additional emails and reflect on the material in general.
Once again we are blessed to have such great readers. The questions asked originated from points we’d made during our research and actually caused us to ask even MORE questions regarding this material. This is critical thinking at its absolute finest and we are again reminded that this is far more than just two guys – this is truly a TEAM. You are doing far more for the advancement of the science of Economics than you can ever imagine.
To the people who have been waiting patiently for this paper, we apologize. Our own ‘deadline’ for this was a month or so ago, but life generally conspires to get in the way of even the best laid plans. While there is little in the way of good news contained in the work itself, there is an upside in that the world has still yet just barely dipped its toes into the dubious world of ‘Modern Monetary Theory’. Knapp should not be blamed for what modern policymakers do in his name – Knapp had a healthy suspicion regarding governments and their use of money and wrote as such.
Over 100 years later and having that same strong sense of skepticism and the benefit of history to go along with it, we present to you this paper. Some of these concepts are already in use today. With regards to those, hopefully the paper helps you understand they ‘why’ of the situation. However, MMT has not yet been fully rolled out in all of its statist grandeur and for that we must rejoice. MMT is the Capstone of the monetary enslavement process going on worldwide at the present time – our opinion. We hope to have some opportunities to discuss this paper publicly. If that doesn’t transpire, then we’ll come up with something because we know there are a lot of you out there who still care what happens – even if the masses do not.
Please click the link below to access the paper. It is in PDF format. You may also right-click the link and save the PDF to your computer.
