The Legacy of Coronavirus – Wall Street Journal

Andy’s Notes: This is where the Keynesian leanings of policymakers and economists are going to finish off an already weakened currency and the economy that uses it. The question used to be ‘Should we borrow to stimulate?’ Now the question is ‘How much will be enough?’. This progression has occurred over the last dozen years and it’s a global one. Debt is the mighty elixir for all that ails. In a completely unironic twist, the lack of economic ‘wiggle room’ people, businesses, and governments have for dealing with a crisis has been largely caused by a reckless accumulation of debt. Now the solution being offered is even more debt. The world has, in fact, gone insane. Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, I rest my case.

Sutton

The full impact of the coronavirus pandemic may take years to play out. But one outcome is already clear: Government, businesses and some households will be loaded with mountains of additional debt.

The federal government budget deficit is on track to reach a record $3.6 trillion in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, and $2.4 trillion the year after that, according to Goldman Sachs estimates. Businesses are drawing down bank credit lines and tapping bond markets. Preliminary signs are emerging that some households are turning to credit for funds, too.

The debt surge is set to shape how governments and the private sector function long after the virus is tamed. Among other things, it could be a weight on the expansion that follows.

Many economists believe low interest rates will help the nation manage the soaring debt load. At the same time, they say high levels of private sector debt could lead to a period of thrift, slowing the recovery if businesses and individuals try to rebuild their savings by holding back on investment and spending.

“People and firms and government are facing a negative shock, and the classic textbook prescription for a temporary shock is to do some borrowing to smooth that out,” says Alan Taylor, an economist and historian at the University of California Davis, who has studied the economic effects of pandemics going back to the Black Death of the 14th century.

Borrowing now amounts to a transfer of economic activity from the future to the present. The payback comes later. “You do have something to worry about in terms of the recovery path,” Mr. Taylor said. Overall U.S. debt as a share of GDP has been rising since the 1980s. Since the 2007-09 crisis, stimulus plans pushed federal debt to post-World War II levels, while household debt shrank as people paid off commitments.

US Debt as Percentage of GDP (2020)

Past crises and buildups in U.S. government debt led to changes in the tax code and sharp fluctuations in inflation. In the private sector, debt loads could become a dividing line between firms that fail and those that emerge more dominant in their industries.

Because states run balanced budgets to avoid large debt, they are likely to dip into rainy day funds in the weeks ahead and could turn quickly to cost cutting to keep their budgets in line in a downturn, squeezing the economy.

Moody’s Analytics sees $90 billion to $125 billion of such cuts or tax increases coming and says the hits will be unevenly spread around the country. New York, Michigan, West Virginia, Louisiana, Missouri, Wyoming and North Dakota are especially vulnerable, it said.

The Federal Reserve, the nation’s central bank, will play the critical role of navigating the nation through the rising tides of debt. It sways the cost of debt service, whether inflation emerges and whether banks and other financial institutions can bear the burden of lending that the nation demands.

So far the Fed is getting high marks from President Trump and many economists and investors for moving quickly to make credit widely available, though it faces challenges and uncertainties deciding how far to extend itself and when and how to pull back. On Thursday, it announced more programs to support $2.3 trillion in lending.

During and after the 2007-09 financial crisis, the Fed expanded its own portfolio of securities and other holdings from less than $800 billion to $4.5 trillion. The Fed unwound some of that as the expansion took hold. Now, in the initial stages of the coronavirus crisis, it has stretched its holdings from $3.8 trillion last September to $5.8 trillion as of April 1, and is on track to increase them by trillions more in the months ahead.

“Had the Fed not come in these past few weeks, we would have had a combination of the Great Depression and the 2008 financial crisis,” said Mohamed El-Erian, chief economic adviser at Allianz, the Munich-based financial firm.

The U.S. government currently has $17.9 trillion in debt held by private investors and other governments—the amount it has borrowed from others to fund its annual budget deficits. That works out to 89% of U.S. gross domestic product, the highest since 1947. Before the coronavirus crisis, debt and deficits were pushed higher by ramped up government spending on military and other programs and tax cuts enacted in 2017.

Government borrowing will soar in the months ahead due to the $2 trillion economic rescue program, higher spending on programs like unemployment insurance and an expected fall in tax revenues amid lower incomes and corporate profits.

Mr. Trump is pushing for an additional Washington stimulus program focused on infrastructure spending. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said another round of stimulus could exceed $1 trillion. That could include an expansion of small business loans and grants by another $250 billion.

‘Modern’ Monetary Theory Paper – Please Read and Distribute

This paper is attached to an older blog entry, but given the fact that the world’s central banks are busy enacting the 5 planks of MMT as we write this, we thought it pertinent to refresh that post. Please feel free to distribute this paper to anyone you know who might be interested in finances or is confused about what is going on financially/economically. If you re-post, we just ask for a simple citation. The timeliness of the material far surpasses the need for any ‘credit’. There is a lot of misinformation going on right now. We have some of the best thinkers out there as readers. Keep thinking! Fear disables critical thinking. We have not been given a spirit of fear, but that of a sound mind. Don’t forget that.

Sutton/Mehl

Liberty Talk Radio – Bailout 2020 Edition

Dear Readers, Andy was on Liberty Talk Radio again with Joe Cristiano to discuss the 2020 economic stimulus package recently passed by Congress. We’ve reached a critical inflection point as a country – we now ‘need’ these stimulus programs / bailouts to continue to function in our current monetary and economic system. During the crisis of 2008, there was a chance to change course. With the passing of 12 subsequent years, so has the chance to sufficiently alter course. We’re locked into the petrodollar system until the next currency model emerges.

For convenience and at the request of several readers, we’re adding the audio from the discussion in mp3 format. You may listen below or download it by right-clicking the link. More updates to follow.

Sutton/Mehl

https://www.andysutton.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/ltr_03282020.mp3

US Treasury Rates – 3/27/2020

The following chart shows the yields on USTreasury securities during month of March. These are end-of-day figures. Intraday, the 1-3 month were negative during the middle portion of the week.

As of Friday, 3/27/2020, the 30-year bond is paying 1.29%. This is slightly off the bottom of less than 1% on 3/9, but is still very negative in real terms (when using the CPI to discount for price inflation). You may click the thumbnail below to enlarge. We are also posting the link to the Treasury’s site as well for your convenience.

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yield

Sutton/Mehl

Retirement Accounts Part of Next Bailout? (We’ve Already Addressed This)

Today, for the first time, a prominent national politician mentioned on television news that portions or potentially all of the pension systems in the United States might have to be ‘nationalized’ to fund additional bailout measures.

It is already abundantly clear that the $2+ Trillion measure that just passed the Senate won’t be nearly enough. We have lived by debt for many years with seemingly few – if any – observable consequences. The old saying says ‘live by the sword, die by the sword’. Perhaps we’re about to find out.

In 2013 there was a bank raid on the tiny Mediterranean island of Cyprus. Panic ensued with depositors losing the ability to withdraw funds, a bank holiday followed and a bail-in resulted. A bail-in? Yes, that’s not a typo. We penned a volley of articles dealing with what transpired in Cyprus and closed out with some possible mechanisms by which US retirement assets would be seized to protect national security interests.

Rather than re-write all of that content we’re going to just re-post what we penned at that time. Tomorrow (hopefully) we’ll be able to take a short guided tour through those articles and apply some of what is going on now and how this whole thing might come together. A friendly reminder. We are not asking for any money. We don’t want any. We are not giving advice. We are providing information and analysis based on almost 50 combined years of studying economics, financial markets, and geopolitics. The link to the compilation – in PDF format – is below. Until next time,

Sutton/Mehl

1-3 Month T-Bill Yields to 0%

An expected consequence of the flight to ‘safety’ (sarcasm ours) has been a decrease in interest rates. While rates have been far into negative territory for quite some time now, today is the first day that nominal rates have gone to 0.0%. What this means is, at the current price, the 1-3 month T-Bill series is paying zero interest.

While this is not disimilar to what most consumers have been experiencing in their checking and even savings accounts for some time now, these are perceived to have even less risk than USGovt. debt. In our next post we’ll go a bit deeper into the various kinds of risk associated with various financial instruments. This is something we probably should have dedicated an entire column to some time ago even though we often referred to various types of risk.

Put simply, there is more generalized systemic risk (non-diversifiable) than at any time in the history of US financial markets. We are certainly living in interesting times. We will re-post an article that was written nearly a decade ago on risk in very general terms. Stay well and stay tuned.

Sutton/Mehl

Dissecting the Disaster – Liberty Talk Radio Returns

Readers: A huge ‘thank you’ to Joe Cristiano for having me on for his debut! We kept the time down, but did talk about a few angles to this whole financial/economic wash out that haven’t really been covered. A few have been totally ignored. It’s our hope that keeping these shorter will encourage more people to listen in. Thanks again Joe and it’s good to have you back!

Q&A Answers – 3/21/2020

Since we were unable to do Liberty Talk Radio again, I’m going to address the questions we received here. The chart below will be a point of reference for most of them.

The chart above shows the Dow Jones Industrial Average from approximately 1905. You’ll have to click to see the chart in detail and I apologize for that – it is hard to get a decent chart with that kind of timeline.

The first ‘peak’ if you can even call it that was the roaring 20s and the bursting of the speculative bubble in late 1929. The Dow would lose more than 75% of its value before the move ended.

The next events are pointed to as well. The main question people have is ‘How was the DJIA near 30,000 to begin with?’ It’s a good question. There are a couple of reasons. First is inflation (growth of the money supply). More money chasing after a relatively fixed set of goods produces higher prices, all else being equal. Let’s proceed through the timeline to get to an answer about Dow 30,000.

Inflation and the revocation of the Glass-Steagall Act allowed for the run-up and eventual blowup of the dot-com bubble. The fact that many of the dot -com firms never made a single penny in profits yet sold for hundreds of dollars a share contributed as well. We’d call this part a speculative bubble. Inflation put the money in the system to allow the bubble to reach the level it did.

After the 2002-03 recovery, the central banks (globally) began serious interference in markets, causing distortions and artificially low interest rates (aka cost of capital) that allowed the next bubble – the housing bubble to inflate. Again, more money in the system due to inflation and a lower cost to that money thanks to the central banks and voila! Boom.

If you thought that was dramatic, the federal reserve in the US and other central banks began something known as ‘quantitative easing’ or QE. This is a fancy term for printing money from thin air and injecting it into the financial system and economy. In the business we call it ‘hot money’ because it’s like a hot potato. It moves around very quickly. From 2009-2019, we had multiple opportunities for what is happening right now and each time, the central banks intervened with more hot money and you can see by the shape of the curve after 2009 how the slope increases dramatically.

This general shape of curve is consistent with monetary systems that are built on fractional reserve banking and that feature a unit of currency that isn’t backed by anything tangible. Until 1971, the USDollar was at least partially backed by gold. I didn’t mark the area, but if you look on the chart at where the curve really starts to accelerate upwards, that was right in the 1971 time frame.

There has been some speculation about fractional reserve monetary systems of late. The important thing to note is that this particular type of system allows for inflation (the creation of new money) when debt is incurred. A quick example is in order. I take 100 depreciated American dollars to the bank and deposit it. Joe Cristiano comes along and asks my bank for a loan, they will lend him up to around $90 of my deposit. However, the bank still owes me my $100 initial deposit. At this point, the money supply went from $100 to $190.

One of the often used misconceptions is that, therefore, when loans are repaid, that equals deflation (the destruction of money). It does not. Let’s use our above example. Joe repays his loan to the bank after 30 days. Let’s say they were very charitable and say they charged him 1% total interest for the 30-day loan. So, he would repay $90.90. Now, my initial $100 is still in there so the total is now $190.90. No deflation.

However, when people pay down loans instead of taking out more debt it does dramatically slow the rate of bank-created inflation. This happened during 2010. Governments don’t like this because they’ve invested a great deal of time convincing people that inflation is necessary for growth to occur. If the people won’t borrow, you can sure bet the governments will do it for them and that is exactly what took place in 2010.

A final thought. A few asked if what is going on would have happened if we didn’t have a global biologic event. As you can see by the chart above, we’ve been long overdue. The QE done by the federal reserve is unhealthy for the economy and if our economy was truly healthy, it wouldn’t need constant stimulus or massive federal, state, local, and personal deficits to function. The ‘solution’ for nearly 2 decades has been to print money and blow up bubbles. Put simply, at some point bubbles always burst and this most recent one was looking for its pin.

Sutton, Mehl – 3/21/2020

Q&A Session on Liberty Talk Radio 3/19/20 @ 24:00 UTC

Hello Readers,

I will be on either a brief Q&A segment with Joe Cristiano’s Liberty Talk Radio or I’ll be releasing a short podcast this evening. I know many of you are not in the US so my apologies for the short notice. Please email your questions when you can and we’ll go from there.

Topics? While I have medical training, I am not qualified to speak on the issue of COVID-19 beyond the most general of terms. I would like to focus on the global financial markets and the very strong likelihood that another 2008-style event was imminent as early as last summer.

Now, with global markets shredded, economies left in doubt, and the population of a growing number of countries behind closed doors, what needs to happen next? We’ve heard some solutions. Are they the right ones?

We’ll be addressing these issues – and your questions – tonight. Don’t miss it!

Best,

Andy Sutton